Legislature(2011 - 2012)CAPITOL 106
02/09/2012 08:00 AM House STATE AFFAIRS
Audio | Topic |
---|---|
Start | |
HB311 | |
HB190 | |
Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ | SB 89 | TELECONFERENCED | |
*+ | HJR 33 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+ | TELECONFERENCED | ||
+= | HB 190 | TELECONFERENCED | |
+= | HB 311 | TELECONFERENCED | |
HB 311-REPORTS TO APOC 8:12:19 AM CHAIR LYNN announced that the first order of business was HOUSE BILL NO. 311, "An Act relating to certain information filed with the Alaska Public Offices Commission; and providing for an effective date." 8:12:52 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to rescind the House State Affairs Standing Committee's action in reporting CSHB 311(STA) out of the House State Affairs Standing Committee on 2/7/12. 8:13:22 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN objected for the purpose of discussion. 8:13:51 AM REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA, on behalf of the House Rules Standing Committee, sponsor, explained the reason behind the motion to rescind. She indicated that while Representative Hawker's focus was on electronic filing, she had encouraged the allowance of paper filing. She further indicated that after hearing feedback from the Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC) and legislators who still file by paper, she has realized that the movement is toward electronic filing and CSHB 311(STA) did not support that movement. Representative Kerttula noted that there is a version of the proposed legislation she hopes will be adopted, that would still allow APOC to grant exceptions to those who are not able to file electronically, and would allow a one-year grace period, through a campaign cycle, to "bring everybody onto the electronic filing." 8:15:09 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN removed his objection. There being no further objection, HB 311, as amended, was before the committee. 8:15:23 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS) for HB 311, Version 27-LS1233\D, Bullard, 2/8/12, as a work draft. There being no objection, Version D was before the committee. 8:17:52 AM REPRESENTATIVE MIKE HAWKER, Alaska State Legislature, explained the changes made in Version D, on behalf of the House Rules Standing Committee, sponsor. He said under Version D, electronic filing would be mandatory with two exceptions: the exception already under statute wherein APOC may make exemptions from electronic filing when it determines it is necessary to do so; and a transition provision that would allow paper filing for one more year, through the end of the current election cycle. 8:19:13 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said Section 1 of Version D is consistent with Section 1 of the original bill, in that it would ensure that when imposing electronic filing, whatever form imposed by APOC would be accessible on the APOC web site. It would also ensure that a candidate is allowed to file electronically in a manner that involves submitting data in the form of an electronic spreadsheet or data file in a format prescribed by APOC. He said the intent is to encourage APOC to create an electronic filing mechanism that is easy for candidates to use and tracks their use; however, if for any reason a candidate has difficulty accessing the system through the web site, he/she would be allowed to submit data via an electronic spreadsheet approved by APOC, and APOC would then be able to take that data and upload it into the commission's system. 8:21:52 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER, in response to Representative Johansen, said the provision [in Section 1, paragraph (2)], allowing filing in the form of an electronic spreadsheet, is a permanent provision. In response to a follow-up question, he confirmed that this provision would be available to all who file, whether or not they apply for an exemption. 8:22:38 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said AS 15.13.110 outlines what APOC must disclose to the public, and Section 2 of Version D clarifies that APOC would satisfy its requirement to publish information filed by paper by posting a copy of that information via a scanned image within two days after receiving it. He said the two-day period is consistent with the reporting mandate in AS 15.13.040. REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said under current statute, the commission must produce a summary of all filings within 30 days following the election. He relayed that language in Section 2 of Version D would change that to within 30 days of the filing of all electronic reports. He said because of the speed of electronic reporting, it should be available instantly. He said Version D would maintain the current mandate that the commission must make available, within 30 days of the election, summaries for reports filed by paper. 8:30:03 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER directed attention to Section 3, which read as follows: *Sec.3.AS 15.13.110 is amended by adding a new subsection to read: (i) During a campaign period, the commission may not change the manner or format in which reports required of a candidate under this chapter must be filed. In this subsection, "campaign period" means the period beginning on the date that a candidate files a declaration of candidacy under AS 15.25.030 or a letter of intent under AS 15.25.105 and ending on the date that a report must be filed under AS 15.13.110(a)(4). REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said he supplied the committee with a suggested amendment, [subsequently titled Amendment 1], which would change the definition of "campaign period" on the second sentence of subsection (i), in Section 3. He said the amendment would simplify the bill by adding generic language that would cover all campaign periods, rather than trying to inventory them all; it would make the campaign period begin on the date each candidate becomes eligible to receive campaign contributions and end on the date the final report must be filed. 8:36:00 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER explained that even if two campaign periods overlap for a particular candidate, he/she still cannot raise money until 18 months before the General Election; therefore, there would always be a window during which APOC would be allowed to make changes. 8:39:18 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER stated that Section 4 would create a one- year window, which would allow candidates to file by paper until February 16, 2013. He said, "After that, we revert completely to the electronic filing mandate that's actually been on the books since 2007, but has not been enforced." Representative Hawker said Section 5 is a protection clause, under which any candidate who, during the current campaign cycle, files electronically consistent with methods under Section 1 of the proposed legislation or by a paper format approved by the commission, will not be subject to a penalty for failure to file. 8:42:12 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER stated a conflict of interest. He explained that on 2/1/12, he filed statutorily required disclosures via a spreadsheet format that had been acceptable up to 12/29/11. He said he does not have the necessary computer equipment in Juneau to legally avail himself of the electronic system being imposed by APOC. He offered his understanding that although he has requested an exemption from APOC, it is still possible that he could be fined, and the proposed legislation would protect him from being fined. 8:43:28 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER said Section 6 would make Sections 1-4 retroactive to 12/1/11. 8:44:34 AM The committee took an at-ease from 8:44 a.m. to 8:46 a.m. 8:46:31 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER referred again to the suggested amendment. 8:47:00 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to adopt Amendment 1, which read as follows [original punctuation provided, with some handwritten changes]: Page 2, line 15, following "subsection": DELETE "'campaign period' means the period beginning on the date that a candidate files a declaration of candidacy under AS 15.25.030 or letter of intent under AS 15.25.105 and ending on the date that a report must be filed under AS 15.13.110(a)(4)." INSERT "'campaign period' means the period beginning on the date that a candidate become eligible to receive campaign contributions under this chapter and ending on the date that a final report for that same campaign must be filed." 8:48:09 AM REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON objected and then withdrew her objection. CHAIR LYNN announced that there being no further objection, Amendment 1 was adopted. 8:48:53 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER reiterated the effect of Amendment 1. 8:49:46 AM REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA echoed the previous statements made by Representative Hawker regarding the effects of HB 311. 8:50:12 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER, in response to a series of questions from Chair Lynn, offered clarification of what would and would not be changed under HB 311, Version D. In response to Representative Seaton, confirmed that the bill addresses only candidate filings; it does not address groups or non-group entities. 8:51:48 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN noted that the next reporting period for legislators takes place in six months, and he asked if the bill sponsor had considered adopting APOC's new system in conjunction with the report that takes place 30 days prior to the August primary. He ventured that in the next six months, he could probably find enough time to learn the new system. 8:53:26 AM REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA said she thinks the full cycle is less confusing and gives everyone more time to adjust to the new system. 8:54:51 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER added that there is nothing in HB 311 that would prohibit a candidate from adopting the electronic filing mechanism more quickly. He then emphasized that HB 311 is nonpartisan legislation. 8:56:37 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN stated his belief in transparency of politics. He asked if there had been any discussion with APOC about the idea of changing to electronic filing in six-month's time. 8:57:29 AM REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA said no. REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN questioned whether APOC needs time to figure out an electronic system that it already has in place. RESENTATIVE KERTTULA said she thinks the extra time would benefit everyone involved. She said she thinks HB 311 is a good compromise. 8:59:28 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN posited that although used as an example of someone who still files by paper, Representative Gruenberg and his staff have had training in electronic filing. 9:00:22 AM REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON said many times there are unintended consequences in legislation. She said it is difficult for legislators to "change gears" mid-session. She said the focus during session should be on doing the right thing, and she opined that HB 311 would relieve everyone's burden. 9:01:39 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER stated that at its last hearing of HB 311, the committee had accepted a motion to attach a zero fiscal note to the proposed legislation. He stated his assumption that the zero fiscal note would apply, as well, to Version D. 9:02:17 AM REPRESENTATIVE PETERSEN said he would like confirmation for the record that the intent of Version D is not to create any loopholes by which a legislator could not file, but that conversely, HB 311 would facilitate transitioning to the new electronic system, which would make it easier for APOC to get information out to the public in a much more timely manner. REPRESENTATIVE KERTTULA answered that is correct. 9:03:13 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER reiterated that HB 311 is nonpartisan legislation. 9:03:32 AM REPRESENTATIVE HAWKER, in response to Representative Seaton and Chair Lynn, confirmed that HB 311 would apply to both incumbents and non-incumbent candidates. 9:04:26 AM PAUL DAUPHINAIS, Director, Alaska Public Offices Commission (APOC), first clarified that at the last hearing of HB 311, he had testified on behalf of his position as executive director and his staff, but not on behalf of the commission. He said the commission has not had the time to read and deliberate upon the changes made in Version D. He said the continued requirement to scan documents that are filed on paper and get them up on APOC's web site will hinder transparency to the public. He explained that looking at scanned documents is like looking at a photograph. He said, "It's difficult to compare; you are requiring people to print out or make notes." MR. DAUPHINAIS stated, "APOC did not change the requirements to file electronically; in this case we changed the form that the filing goes in on." He said the new system is currently ready for use, and those who file using that system have more control over their data, because the system will point out any errors that are made. He said APOC does not have the time to do that check for reports filed by paper. CHAIR LYNN indicated that the problem is not the benefits of electronic filing, but the timing of meeting the requirements of the new system. MR. DAUPHINAIS relayed that there has been considerable training offered for the new electronic filing program, and he reported that a fair number of people have already filed using the program via "myAlaska." He said there are two computers available for use in APOC's Juneau office, and he specified that it is lawful for legislators to use those computers because they belong to the public, not to the State of Alaska. 9:08:02 AM MR. DAUPHINAIS confirmed Representative Hawker's previous response to Representative Seaton that the bill applies only to candidates. He offered his understanding that HB 311 would not change the exemption for candidates of municipalities with populations under 15,000. CHAIR LYNN offered his understanding that Representative Kerttula nodded her head in the affirmative. 9:08:50 AM MR. DAUPHINAIS, in response to Representative Johansen, confirmed that the year-end report is due 2/15/12 and the next report is due 30 days prior to the primary election. In response to follow-up questions, he indicated that APOC would be able to adapt to Representative Johansen's previously stated idea to make the shift to required electronic reporting in time for the 30-day reporting deadline. He said APOC is ready to take reports electronically and has training in Juneau scheduled in February. He clarified his previous remark that APOC has not had time to review Version D. He explained the reason he is confident that the State of Alaska-owned computers at APOC can be used by legislators is because they were purchased with the intent that they be available for public use. 9:13:03 AM JOAN MIZE, Acting Project Coordinator, Juneau Office, Alaska Public Offices Commission, stated that because APOC is the entity that requires the reporting, it has to provide the means by which the reporting is done, including its computers. 9:13:48 AM MR. DAUPHINAIS, in response to Representative Petersen, said the Juneau APOC office operates Monday through Friday, from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m., and, with notice, could arrange weekend hours. In response to Representative Seaton, he said it is his understanding that HB 311 applies to any candidates, not just incumbents. In response to Chair Lynn, he said there are public-use computers in APOC's Anchorage office, as well, but not in its Fairbanks office or elsewhere. 9:15:18 AM REPRESENTATIVE P. WILSON offered her understanding that she cannot do [campaign business] on any piece of equipment bought with state money. She indicated that she received this information from "our ethics person." 9:16:46 AM MR. DAUPHINAIS said this issue is governed by AS 24.60. In response to Chair Lynn, he emphasized that he does not speak on behalf of the Legislative Ethics Committee. 9:17:11 AM MR. DAUPHINAIS, in response to Representative Johansen, confirmed that under campaign rules, any candidate is allowed to purchase a computer and printer with campaign money and keep that equipment once the campaign is over. 9:19:18 AM CHAIR LYNN, after ascertaining that there was no one else who wished to testify, closed public testimony. 9:19:38 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER moved to report CSHB 311, Version 27- LS1233\D, Bullard, 2/8/12, as amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and an attached zero fiscal note. 9:19:59 AM REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN objected. He said he would like the committee to consider an amendment that would set the requirement for electronic filing at the first 30-day report. He noted that the House State Affairs Standing Committee is the final committee of referral before the proposed legislation is heard on the House floor. He said he has no problem giving legislators a break in the electronic filing requirement deadline, but thinks everyone can be prepared to file electronically within six months. He reiterated his desire to support transparency in politics by supporting legislation that would get the reports out to the people in a more expedient manner. REPRESENTATIVE JOHANSEN maintained his objection. CHAIR LYNN said he thinks Representative Johansen makes some good points; however, he said he thinks it is appropriate to move HB 311 out of committee to allow the full House to consider it. He talked about the work the committee does in looking for unintended consequences. 9:26:52 AM REPRESENTATIVE KELLER said he agrees with Representative Johansen's wish for transparency, and said he did not hear Representative Johansen implying that anyone wants to hide information. 9:27:57 AM A roll call vote was taken. Representatives P. Wilson, Seaton, Keller, Petersen, and Lynn voted in favor of the motion to report CSHB 311, Version 27-LS1233\D, Bullard, 2/8/12, as amended, out of committee with individual recommendations and the attached zero fiscal note. Representative Johansen voted against it. Therefore, CSHB 311(STA) was reported out of the House State Affairs Standing Committee by a vote of 5-1.
Document Name | Date/Time | Subjects |
---|